Do Animals Have a Sixth Sense?

Wildlife officials in Sri Lanka expressed surprise Wednesday that they found no evidence of large-scale animal deaths from the weekend's massive tsunami — indicating that animals may have sensed the wave coming and fled to higher ground.
An Associated Press photographer who flew over Sri Lanka's Yala National Park in an air force helicopter saw abundant wildlife, including elephants, buffalo, deer, and not a single animal corpse.
Floodwaters from the tsunami swept into the park, uprooting trees and toppling cars onto their roofs — one red car even ended up on top of a huge tree — but the animals apparently were not harmed and may have sought out high ground, said Gehan de Silva Wijeyeratne, whose Jetwing Eco Holidays ran a hotel in the park.
"This is very interesting. I am finding bodies of humans, but I have yet to see a dead animal," said Wijeyeratne, whose hotel in the park was totally destroyed in Sunday's tidal surge.
"Maybe what we think is true, that animals have a sixth sense," Wijeyeratne said.

Astronauts Raid Space Pantry

The two U.S. and Russian
astronauts on the International Space Station had to rely on a
candy-laden diet for five weeks because their predecessors
raided the pantry.
"Both of us ended up losing a few pounds," U.S. astronaut
Leroy Chiao said in a news conference from the station on
Wednesday. "We looked at it as kind of a challenge, kind of a
camping adventure, roughing it I guess."
Chiao and Russian cosmonaut Salizhan Sharipov, who arrived
at the station in October, had to cut calories because the
previous crew got into their food rations.
They had permission to do that but did not record how much
they had eaten and "It was not until we got well into the
mission, we started seeing on board we weren't going to have
enough," Chiao said.
He and Sharipov inventoried the remaining food, which was
heavy on candy and desserts, and worked out a diet to stretch
their supplies until a new shipment of food arrived aboard a
Russian cargo carrier on Saturday.
"We had to kind of cut back to about half rations of what I
would call real food -- meat, potatoes, vegetables. We had to
supplement and make up for part of that calorie deficit with
sweets," Chiao said. "It was not an unhealthy diet but not an
ideal diet."
The unmanned Russian supply ship brought 2.5 ton of
food, water, equipment and other supplies, including family
photos and other Christmas presents from home. The astronauts
were still unpacking it on Wednesday.
Had the supply ship been delayed significantly, the
astronauts would have had to cut short their six-month mission
and return to Earth aboard a Soyuz capsule docked at the
station.

Gravity Losing Its Pull?

This is an edited version of an L.A. Times story - for full version, go to the paper's website.

It was in 1980 that John Anderson first wondered if something funny was going on with gravity.The Jet Propulsion Laboratory physicist was looking over data from two Pioneer spacecraft that had been speeding through the solar system for nearly a decade.Only something was off base. The craft weren't where they were supposed to be.Rather than traveling at a constant velocity of more than 25,000 mph toward the edge of the solar system, Pioneers 10 and 11 were inexplicably slowing down. Even factoring in the gravitational pull of the sun and its other planets couldn't explain what he was seeing.How could that be?At first, Anderson figured there must be a simple explanation. Maybe there was a malfunction on board the spacecraft. Maybe his calculations were wrong.Shy, bookish and soft-spoken, Anderson was not the type to call a news conference to announce that two U.S. spacecraft appeared to be disobeying the physical laws of the universe."I assumed something was going on that I didn't understand," said Anderson, now 70. "So I just kept at it."For years.It was a lonely, often comfortless pursuit. Some critics pounded away at him for daring to question the conventional wisdom about the force that keeps our feet on the ground and the stars on their appointed rounds. Others questioned his math.Two decades later, Anderson's work on what is now called the Pioneer Anomaly may finally be paying off.In October, a European Space Agency panel recommended a space mission to determine whether Anderson had found something that could rewrite physics textbooks. Some cosmologists even speculate the Pioneer Anomaly might help unravel some of the thorniest problems in theoretical physics, such as the existence of "dark matter" or mysterious extra-dimensional forces predicted by string theory.For public consumption at least, Anderson and his close-knit group of researchers will not permit themselves the luxury of such grandiose speculation. Whether Anderson will be remembered as the man who changed history or the guy who spent decades chasing an illusion, all that's clear at this point is that he will be remembered.
Having worked on the Mariner missions in the 1960s, he was chosen to be principal investigator for gravity research on both Pioneer missions.It would prove to be a surprisingly long ride. The TRW-built Pioneers performed so well that after the initial two-year mission ended, NASA decided to send them on a new mission to explore the solar system's outer planets.They were the first spacecraft to travel through the asteroid belt, which some scientists at the time thought could be as dangerous as a field of icebergs. Pioneer 10 was first to pass the orbit of Pluto. For many years, until overtaken by the speedier Voyager 1, the Pioneers were the farthest venturing man-made objects in space.By 1980, the vehicles were still zipping through space in fine shape — when Anderson stumbled upon the unexpected."I started plotting this anomalous acceleration toward the sun," Anderson said. In space science-speak, that meant the spacecraft were improbably slowing down.To be sure, the anomaly was small, just 8 X 10--8 centimeters/second2. That amounted to about 8,000 miles a year, a tiny fraction of the 219 million miles the spacecraft covered annually. The anomaly is about 10 billion times weaker than the Earth's gravity.But over time, even inches and meters add up.Today, after three decades, the difference is about 248,000 miles, the distance from Earth to the moon.Anderson, ever the cautious scientist, didn't tell anyone what he was seeing for a decade. Early on, the probes were still so close to the sun that he reasoned radiation and solar wind — streams of ionized gas spewing forth through the solar system — could be affecting them.The other possibility was a spacecraft "systematic" — an onboard mechanical problem. Prime suspects were gas leaks, along with releases of energy by the plutonium-powered radioisotope thermoelectric generators that provided electric power to the instruments.None of these candidates seemed capable of producing errors as large as Anderson was charting.There was one piece of evidence that seemed to support the idea that the anomaly could be real: It was almost exactly the same on both spacecraft. On the other hand, both Pioneers were built by the same company to identical specifications, so why shouldn't the same problem show up on both?As years passed, and the Pioneer probes moved away from the sun's influence, the anomaly didn't disappear — or change even one iota.Anderson was stumped. Unable to get the problem out of his head, he began spending his own time burrowing deeper into the numbers streaming back from space.He was still scratching his head when physicist Michael Martin Nieto at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico called up one day in 1994 looking for material for an upcoming speech about new developments in physics. Anything interesting going on?"Well, I've got this thing with Pioneer," Anderson said."I almost fell off my chair," Nieto said.
That's when, for good or ill, the Pioneer Anomaly went public. Through all the years, Anderson has never permitted himself to hope he might have found something that could change the way people think about the cosmos. Or that his name would go down in history."I used to think the probability of making a fundamental discovery was pretty remote," Anderson said. "Now, I kind of wonder about it."Whatever the solution to the Pioneer Anomaly, it will be reached without any more help from the Pioneers. NASA lost contact with Pioneer 11 in November 1995. Pioneer 10 sent its last message home in January 2003.Anderson can't help feeling a touch of sadness. "You do feel a loss."The spacecraft are now ghostly twins speeding through interstellar space. Pioneer 10 could reach the star Aldebaran in the constellation Taurus in about 2 million years, scientists say. Unless, of course, some uncharted force brings it to a halt, or twists its course toward some dark corner of space.

Stereotypes or Sharp Research?

Among the many things that the GOP did right in the election was to target their audience, sell them the party line and get them to the polls.
One of the ways they accomplished the first step was extensive market research. That research told them where to canvas and where to advertise and here are some of the results of their research.

--- Democrats watch more TV than Republicans.
--- During the week, Republicans turn off the TV earlier than Democrats. Republicans who stay up watch Leno, Democrats who stay up watch Letterman.
--- Big Republican channels: Speedvision, Golf channel. Big Democratic channels: CourtTV, Game Show Network.
--- Democrats are more likely to go to the movies.
--- More Republicans and undecided voters go to health clubs.
--- Get this: "One of the shows most popular with Republicans, especially Republican women ages 18 to 34, turned out to be be 'Will & Grace.'"
--- Republicans are more likely to drive Porsches, Jaguars, Land Rovers. Democrats are more likely to drive Volvos, Subarus, Mazdas,Volkswagens, Honda.
--- Republicans are more likely to water-ski, snow-ski, and do volunteer work.
--- Republicans are far less likely than average Americans to dance; Democrats are far more likely. (who knew Footloose had such a valid subtext)
--- Republicans are more likely to like Nascar, and college football. Democrats are far more likely to like women's basketball.