Brahma Blogs

This team blog is designed to allow a group of friends who have known each other for 20+ years to share their thoughts on culture, politics, religion, relationships, etc.

Tuesday, May 31, 2005

PO BRONSON IN THE NEWS

Check it out. The Associated Press wrote an article about Po and his writer friends and the office they all share.


Fear. Isolation. Loneliness. Ah, the writer's life.
A group of freelancers in San Francisco believe they've found a
way to help remedy writer's block, share advice, get feedback on a
first draft and keep from driving their families crazy. They call
it The Grotto.
Strip away the pretentious moniker and their strategy is
deceptively simple -- shared office space.
"Staying home is a path to madness," explains Ethan Watters,
author of "Urban Tribes: A Generation Redefines Family, Friendship
and Commitment" and a founding member of The Grotto. "The work
itself is introspective and, in a way, working by yourself is a
constant fight with whatever demons you have. ... Whether you're
prone to napping or you want to turn on the TV to check out CNN. It
just becomes a harder demon to fight when you don't have a sense of
group momentum."
Watters, along with Po Bronson, best-selling author of the
dot-com era defining "The Nudist on the Late Shift," and Ethan
Canin, emergency room physician turned award-winning author of
"The Palace Thief," founded The Grotto in 1994. They rented an
old Victorian with space for six writers. Their criteria for
leasing a space? Be serious enough about writing to be willing to
pay rent.
Two years later, it was the height of the dot-com boom and their
monthly rent tripled. They found a new space -- in a former animal
hospital on one of San Francisco's seediest blocks -- and quickly
filled former exam rooms with 21 inhabitants, as they call
themselves.
Rents are back where they were in 1995. The group pays $1.50 per
square foot, which comes to about $150 to $200 a month for each
renter, depending on the size of their space, Bronson explains.
Each Grotto-ite also has chores to do each month, from changing
toilet paper in the shared restrooms to taking out the trash to
recycling. Everyone pitches in for a cleaning crew.
"The vibe here is, `Come do your chores, do your work,"' says
David Duncan, author of the newly released book, "The Geneticist
Who Played Hoops With My DNA ... and Other Masterminds From the
Frontier of BioTech."
"There's not a lot of messing around."
Everyone has a key and sets his or her own hours at The Grotto.
Lunches are usually shared on the roof. As The Grotto has aged, so
have its inhabitants. Most are in their 30s and 40s. Many are
married. There are now eight children among them. Family photos are
prominently displayed on desks and walls. The kitchen and the
rooftop are the only true common areas. News clippings, press kits,
lists of best sellers and other advertisements of each others'
success cover a large bulletin board.
There's no waiting list or application process for a spot at The
Grotto. There's little turnover; writers rarely leave. The founders
encourage fans to set up their own communities. They even offer to
help. But there's also no room for big egos.
Watters, in an interview from Las Vegas where he was working on
an article for GQ about golf hustlers, explains: "You can take
fairly strong personalities into a place like The Grotto ...
because you don't have to work together every day. ... No one's
your boss, no one's going to tell you you did a bad job. ... The
only interactions are positive. Because of that you can get strong
personalities that not only survive, but it's a really good place
for them."
Bronson, who shares his office with Sammy, his golden Retriever,
agrees and says jealousy and envy are poisons.
"Learn to set that aside and realize someone's success does not
take away from yours," he says. "You can be driven, you can be
ambitious without being competitive against each other."
He proudly announces he gives his agent's name and number to
anyone who asks. (Later, he does.) He also offers a reporter an
excerpt from his forthcoming book, "Why Do I Love These People."
(It's fascinating.)
Journalist and playwright Rodes Fishburne, in a conspiratorial
tone, offers to share the secret of The Grotto's success. He's
working on a novel called "Going to See the Elephant." There's a
San Francisco map on his wall with push pins marking the spots
where his characters live.
"This is the technology that makes this place work," he says.
He leans forward from his chair to reach his office door. "If I'm
here, and my door's closed, I'm working," he says. "It's solitary
because of the door and communal when you want it to be."
Most inhabitants acknowledge that when someone's up and
wandering or playing hoops on the roof or fumbling around in the
kitchen, something's wrong.
"If you left your office, it's because you're stuck," Bronson
explains. "It's the little creative challenges we face. ...
Someone's right there to deal with you if you need it. It's just
the sense that you're not alone."
Nearly every one of the 10 people sitting around the table on an
unusually warm San Francisco spring day nods and chimes in.
"If I stay home and write in my kitchen, I may not see anyone
else for 48 hours. It's just the office," says novelist Noah
Hawley.
Fishburne uses short story master John Cheever -- who dressed
every morning in a suit and tie, kissed his wife goodbye and headed
to the basement of his building where he undressed, hung up his
clothes and wrote in his underwear -- to illustrate his point.
"For us, coming to The Grotto is putting on our suit and tie,"
he says. "It's a psychological state of mind."

Thursday, May 26, 2005

Brahma Blogs

Brahma Blogs
Hey, Julia here.
I'm not going to the reunion.

Monday, May 16, 2005

Mammalian Victory over the Dinosaur!

Tuesday, May 10, 2005

The Final Frontier?

AP Article on Final "Enterprise" Episode:

"Star Trek: Enterprise" is about to go
where it has never gone before: off the air, taking the "Star
Trek" franchise with it.
After the two-hour finale airs (8 p.m. EDT Friday on UPN) this
will be the first time in 18 years that no first-run "Trek"
series is on TV.
"Enterprise" lasted four seasons. It was the first "Trek"
spinoff to last fewer than seven seasons. Plummeting ratings did
what no Klingon battlecruiser or Borg collective could accomplish.
And this time, network honchos didn't bow to Trekker pressure to
renew the series, as they did in the face of a write-in campaign
that gave the original "Star Trek" a third year on the tube
(1966-69).
In fact, many longtime Trekkers stopped watching long ago. There
were gripes going back at least as far as the fourth incarnation,
"Star Trek: Voyager" (1995-2001), about lame or retreaded plots,
goofy aliens and the weak leadership of "Voyager's" Kathryn
Janeway (Kate Mulgrew) and "Enterprise's" Jonathan Archer (Scott
Bakula).
Sadly lacking were the rules-be-damned machismo of James
Tiberius Kirk (William Shatner) or the class and thoughtful
maturity of Jean-Luc Picard (Patrick Stewart).
The original "Trek" was not above a little T&A to jazz up
ratings. (Who can forget Yeoman Rand's miniskirt or the
green-skinned Orion dancers?) But "Voyager" may have upped the
silliness ante with a Borg who wore skin-tight catsuits and high
heels, while "Enterprise" had a curvaceous Vulcan officer
stripping every other episode.
No villain like the unstoppable Borg cropped up for a decade,
either.
Supporters say "Enterprise" had vastly improved in its final
season and blame other reasons for the ratings drop: weekend reruns
that drew an audience but weren't counted in the Nielsens; ditto
for those who taped or TiVo'd the program. And shifting
"Enterprise" to a Friday time slot didn't help.
Producer Rick Berman has cited the problem of "franchise
fatigue" after decades of "Star Trek" spinoffs.
Perhaps, some Trekkers argue, it was time to take a rest. After
all, it was 18 years between the original "Trek" and "The Next
Generation," which went on to have a vast following.
In the meantime, there are the reruns, the DVD packages, the
video games, the hordes of fans in chat rooms and conventions and
the contributions to popular culture that range from Klingon
language academies to the phrase "Beam me up, Scotty!"
Things have changed a lot over the years, both within and
without the "Trek" universe, as scholars drew real-world
comparisons to the shows.
The original series had a Cold War between the Federation and
the Russians, er, Klingons and a cheerfully naive approach to
solving racial and political conflicts.
"Next Generation" (1987-94) had a post-Soviet view in which
the Klingons were allies, and a politically correct view that the
values of other cultures, no matter how weird or repugnant,
deserved respect.
Both also shared a sunny idealism that humans had overcome their
own conflicts, lived in peace, and were on voyages of discovery and
knowledge for the sheer joy of it.
The optimistic view of a united future humanity that the
original "Trek" offered began to crumble in earnest with "Star
Trek: Deep Space Nine" (1993-1999). The earnest morality of the
first two series gave way to gray areas in which the good guys
dirtied their hands with assassinations and other foul deeds in
fighting a war for survival.
Moral relativism had crept into the sparkling "Trek" universe.
Some viewers were dismayed; others enthralled.
By "Enterprise," actually a prequel set more than a century
before the original series, the plots involved murky machinations
and feuds spreading across the galaxy and even through time.
Innocence was replaced by a somewhat gloomy view. Even the vaunted
Vulcans were portrayed as pompous and dissembling.
But in the meantime, "Trek" no longer had the TV universe to
itself. "Bablyon 5" (1994-1998) created a world arguably as rich
and complex as the Federation's. Nowadays, science fiction fans can
choose from a host of syndicated and cable shows, including "Gene
Roddenberry's Andromeda" (named for "Star Trek's" late creator
and produced by his widow) and the new "Battlestar Galactica."
Maybe there's just too much competition these days, and the
audience is too fragmented.
Maybe even Capt. Kirk couldn't save the franchise.
Maybe, as with people, so with "Trek": the one enemy that
always wins is Time.
Or perhaps, someday in the distant future, "Star Trek" will
rise again. Fans can have only one response to that hope:
Make it so.

Sunday, May 01, 2005

A New Planet?