An Interesting Review

My wife and I only rarely take the kids to the movies. Doing so is expensive and logistically difficult. This past weekend, however, we went to see "Over the Hedge", featuring, among other voices, the voice of William Shatner, and there was even an interesting reference to "The Wrath of Khan" during the credits at the end. Because I worked for a time writing software to produce three-dimensional graphics, I am usually interested in seeing the latest computer-animated movie, if for no other reason than to look for evidence of some difficult-to-render effect or for evidence of physics-based modeling. Anyway, I knew that the kids would enjoy the show.
Another motivation for this weekend's adventure to the movie theater, however, was related to the opening of "The Da Vinci Code". I was motivated to vote against it on opening weekend not simply by refusing to attend but by buying tickets for something else. A feeble gesture, to be sure, and, in the end, to some degree an excuse to do what I usually don't do because of the need for discipline in spending, but a gesture just the same. I suppose that I might eventually read the book by checking out from the library or otherwise borrowing the book. I suppose that I might eventually see the movie if I happen across it on television. But I have no desire to contribute any money to support DVC.
Below is an excerpt from a particularly interesting review of DVC. You may see the complete text of the review by clicking on the image at the top of this post.
From the page:
Astonishingly, after a 2½‑hour seminar on the evils of monotheism, Christianity, and the Catholic Church, The Da Vinci Code tries to have its cake and eat it too, as Langdon suggests to Sophie that "What really matters is what you believe," even questioning whether exploding the "greatest cover-up in history" would really be such a good thing after all: Does Sophie want to "destroy faith or renew it?"
It almost sounds as if Langdon is saying, "So Christianity is a lie -- let the Christians have their lie, if that's what makes them happy." Whatever happened to "For 2000 years the Church has rained oppression and suffering on mankind"?
Is it possible to put all this aside and just enjoy the story as a thriller, an enjoyable yarn? I honestly have no idea how people can take that approach.
Catholic writer Mark Shea tells an anecdote about a college bull session among students at Central Washington University over The Da Vinci Code. "Even if it's just fiction," a student opined, "it's still interesting to think about."
To which another student replied: "Your mother's a whore." And then, to the first student's stunned incredulity, he added, "And even if that's just fiction, it's still interesting to think about."

9 Comments:
At 1:14 PM,
cvo said…
It's interesting you took that approach to "Over the Hedge" because the movie's producers were actually counting on that Anti-DaVinci movement to help boost their box office and that's why they opened it on the same weekend. Didn't really help much.
The thing about phenomena like The DaVinci Code is that once the publicity boulder starts rolling, you can't stop it from rumbling down the Media Mountain. It's like Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, or even American Idol for that matter. Once it becomes the subject of "buzz" and everyone is talking about, the masses feel compelled to buy it, read it, watch it or whatever so they can feel like they are part of the "pop culture community".
It's all about being able to talk at the Watercooler about the latest singer that just got rejected off American Idol or discuss the plot twists in The DaVinci Code.
Exit polls at the theaters over the weekend showed that only half of the DaVinci moviegoers had even read the book. They were just caught up in the hype.
I don't think the popularity of DaVinci Code reflects any shift in religious affiliation or philosophy in our country. In fact, I did a story last week for The Today Show about pastors of non-denominational and evangelical churches who were giving sermons about DaVinci Code and giving out tickets to see the movie to bring more non-believers and lapsed Catholics "under the tent." They used the movie to get more attention to their own congregations by disputing the historical inaccuracies in the book and the movie.
At 2:16 PM,
Unknown said…
I don't think the popularity of DaVinci Code reflects any shift in religious affiliation or philosophy in our country.
Nor do I.
The problem, however, has to do with the fact that---at least for those of us who still have yet to fall prey to dementia---every book read and every movie seen has some permanent effect on the mind. Although sometimes the effect is the opposite of what the author or producer would intend, sometimes the effect on the individual is precisely what is intended, especially if the work is crafted well.
To take an extreme example, that is why one should avoid pornography, which forcefully proclaims a lie that every man wants to believe is true. Watching something that has some effectiveness in convincing the viewer that what is false is actually true, particularly if the viewer is aware of the effect beforehand, is a bad thing.
Even when not considering such an extreme case, one might still wish to avoid exposing oneself to any presentation that has tempts the viewer to believe something that is actually false. Naturally, even if one would oneself be immune to such temptation, one should nevertheless be interested in opposing a program of false but tempting claims, promoted under the guise of a fiction that supposedly has many true elements.
This reminds me of the principle by which I claim that, in general, sexual content is more damaging to the impressionable consumer (such as the child) than is violent content in the media. The idea is that it is easy, say, for a teenage boy to tell that a violent scene is unrealistic, though enjoyable to watch. His ability to distinuish reality from fantasy renders the effect of viewing the violence on his personality quite minimal. On the other hand, the boy will have difficulty in seeing that some explicit sexual content is unrealistic, in part because he wants so badly to believe that it is in fact realistic, though he should know better. Seeing the explicit sexual content can have a permanent effect on his mind and behavior, as he seeks to gratify himself either through fantasy and masturbation or through the pursuit of girls as mere objects of his sexual desire. In no way is he absolved of responsibility for his behavior, but the cumulative effect on society from sexual content in the media is, in my opinion, decidedly negative.
A similar case can be made for unrealistic but irresistably attractive romantic content for girls.
Anyway, my opposition to all things DVC is based on the same principle. Millions of readers and viewers will be able to distinguish some of the more egregious claims, but their attitudes toward Catholicism in particular and toward Christianity in general will be negatively colored because of their inability to recognize other subtle and not-so-subtle (but attractive) falsehoods as such.
At 2:37 PM,
cvo said…
Whoa!
My neck hurts from the sudden turn that this conversation took.
I agree that sexual content with no parental guidance or appropriate context is much more damaging to young and immature minds than violent content for many of the same reasons that you cite. I think I take a much more lenient and lassez-faire attitude toward pornography when it comes to consenting adults choosing to watch or look at it, but that's a whole other discussion.
As far as DVC's effect on the perceptions of the Catholic Church, I think the Catholic League, the Vatican and other high-ranking Catholic groups took the right approach by not boycotting the movie and kind of laying low on this one to try to avoid making it into a controversial movie. Despite those efforts, the mass media (guilty as charged), non-Catholic religious groups and movie studio marketers were still able to stir up enough discussion to get millions of people to see the film. I'm sure most of the people who hadn't read the book, but saw the movie on opening weekend felt like they were going to be missing out on something if they didn't see it.
At 3:05 PM,
Unknown said…
Whoa!
My neck hurts from the sudden turn that this conversation took.
Sorry about that.
Your post offered nothing with which I should take issue, but the one sentence that I quoted did bring to my mind the distinction between looking at DVC as a reflection and looking at DVC as a thing that will be reflected in the culture after it is absorbed by the culture.
So I went off and explored that in my response by speculating about the psychology of the individual viewer.
At 3:11 PM,
cvo said…
No worries.
It's always fun to take a tour inside your labyrinthian mind. You never know what path we'll end up taking.
And I mean that as a sincere form of flattery.
At 3:34 PM,
Unknown said…
:^) Thanks!
Your graciously received compliment and good intentions aside, I am reminded of a quote from a movie:
[Something certainly insulting, follwed by]
"And I mean that in the best possible way."
[Emphasis perceived by me in the articulation of the speaker.]
I don't remember the character or the movie, but I remember that it was extremely funny in context.
At 5:59 PM,
Unknown said…
I think that the quote is spoken by the emperor in "The Emperor's New Groove".
At 6:35 PM,
R said…
Maybe Tom is a Cretan, and we know that all Cretans are liars.
At 8:00 AM,
Meredith said…
Tom and I have had some interesting private discussions about the fact that I'm an avowed -- and unapologetic -- atheist. During those discussions he's repeatedly emphasized how important it is for me to stay open-minded and to continually seek new information that might change my mind.
Tom, what you say here flies in the face of the open-mindedness you claim you posess. I'm going to have to agree with Lark on this one.
And I just had to laugh when I read this:
"The problem, however, has to do with the fact that...every book read and every movie seen has some permanent effect on the mind. Although sometimes the effect is the opposite of what the author or producer would intend, sometimes the effect on the individual is precisely what is intended, especially if the work is crafted well."
Hmm...you could be talking about the Bible, and "Vacation Bible Camps" and all the other brainwashing activities sponsored by organized religions. "...sometimes the effect on the individual is precisely what is intended...
Post a Comment
<< Home